An Analysis of Methods and Equipment for Testing Software

Authors

  • Rahul Tripathi Student, Department of Computer Science, Amity School of Engineering, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Sanjay Singh Student, Department of Computer Science, Amity School of Engineering, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31033/abjar.1.3.1

Keywords:

testing software, equipment, filtering phase, tools, techniques

Abstract

Test-driven development (TDD) is the process of creating software with minimal bugs. At the end of each testing phase, the testing team hopes to have produced code that is completely bug-free. Code testing is something that could assist you in achieving your product quality goals. Providing a number of alternates, testing finds and fixes every bug and helps reduce the overall cost of the code. As a goal, testers should create code that requires less upkeep. However, the most difficult part of checking is finding good examples to verify the code. The testing industry has come a long way. However, before the code is handed over to the customer, it must undergo extensive testing. This document does a great job of describing the many types of testing, outlining its goals, and describing the various stages of the code checking life cycle, as well as the test cases and phases that comprise it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Glenford J. Myers, Corey Sandler, & Tom Badgett. (2011). The art of software testing. (3rd ed.). Wiley Publishing.

Miller. (2981). Introduction to software testing technology. Software Testing & Validation Techniques, IEEE, pp. 4-16.

L.S. Chin, D.J. Worth, & C. Greenough. (2007). A survey of software testing tools for computational science.

Priyanka Yadu, & Dr. Vaibhav Sharma. (2021). A review on software testing tools and technique. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 9(7), 1-8.

Pavithra L et. Al. (2019). Survey on software testing. Journal of Network Communications and Emerging Technologies (JNCET), 9(3).

Shunkun Yang et al. (2016). RGA: A lightweight and effective regeneration genetic algorithm for coverage-oriented software test data generation. Information and Software Technology, 76(1), 19–30.

J. Irena. (2008). Software testing methods and techniques, 30-35.

G. Chandrasekaran, & V. Neethidevan. (2018). Software testing using automated tools. Lucknow, India: Vandana Publications.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-30

How to Cite

Rahul Tripathi, & Sanjay Singh. (2022). An Analysis of Methods and Equipment for Testing Software. Applied Science and Biotechnology Journal for Advanced Research, 1(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.31033/abjar.1.3.1

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2022): November Issue

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Rahul Tripathi, Sanjay Singh

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Research Articles in 'Applied Sciecne and Biotechnology Journal for Advanced Research' are Open Access articles published under the Creative Commons CC BY License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This license allows you to share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.